lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed




Atrial fibrillation, neurocognitive decline and gene expression after cardiopulmonary bypass

Rahul S. DalalI; Ashraf A. SabeI; Nassrene Y. ElmadhunI; Basel RamlawiII; Frank W. SellkeI

DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150070


AF = Atrial fibrillation

CABG = Coronary artery bypass graft

CPB = Cardiopulmonary bypass

NCD = Neurocognitive decline

POAF = Postoperative atrial fibrillation

SR = Sinus rhythm


Surgical advancements have allowed an increasingly older population to undergo cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with a low mortality risk. Efforts have therefore focused on reducing postoperative morbidity. Neurocognitive decline (NCD, up to 80% incidence) and atrial fibrillation (AF, 20-45% incidence) remain two of the most common complications after CPB[1,2]. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) guidelines by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association describe two types of neurocognitive deficits, with type 2 representing the vast majority[3]. Type 2 deficits are global and may include confusion and intellectual and memory decline without a known focal lesion and may significantly impair patients' quality of life. The etiology of these deficits is likely related to multiple factors including age, procedure, CPB time, hypoxia, and inflammation[4]. Up to 30% of type 2 deficits persist for at least one year and early NCD appears to predict long-term deficits[5].

Like NCD, the high incidence of postoperative AF (POAF) has persisted. POAF generally occurs by postoperative day four and may precipitate heart failure and cerebrovascular emboli[6-8]. Because of increased hospital stay and readmissions, it is estimated that healthcare costs for patients who develop POAF are $10,000 higher than for those who do not[7]. Though several factors have been correlated with POAF after cardiac surgery, our inability to eliminate its incidence may be related to unknown pathophysiologic mechanisms. Studies have proposed that oxidation and inflammation after CPB induce cardiomyocyte damage and predispose to the development of atrial arrhythmias[9]. Experiments in a canine model of rapid atrial pacing demonstrated that statins, which are known for their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, reduced shortening of the atrial effective refractory period and thus POAF susceptibility[10]. In a case-control study, our group previously demonstrated that patients with POAF had elevated serum peroxide levels, excess myocardial oxidation, and an increased oxidative genomic response compared with patients in sinus rhythm (SR)[11].

While these complications have been studied independently, prior research suggests an association between POAF and neurologic abnormalities[12]. In a prospective observational study, Stanley et al.[13] found significantly more cognitive deficits in patients who developed POAF, which was also associated with worse cognitive functioning six weeks after surgery. While it is thought that the paroxysmal nature of POAF, embolization, and decreased cardiac output increase risk for neurologic dysfunction, it remains unknown if there are common pathways by which both NCD and POAF arise.

High-throughput microarray provides a practical approach to investigate genomic changes and disease development. Microarrays can screen the entire human genome for regulated genes and bring light to the underlying pathways that may promote morbidities like NCD and POAF. We previously utilized microarray to demonstrate increased expression of genes involved with inflammation and neurologic dysfunction in patients who developed NCD after CPB compared to patients without NCD (NORM)[14]. We now examine gene expression changes in patients who develop both POAF and NCD (POAF+NCD) compared to patients spared of these complications (SR+NORM) and those who develop POAF alone (POAF+NORM). To further investigate the underlying pathophysiology of these disease processes we utilize modern microarray and bioinformatics techniques to identify genes that may be associated with the combined incidence of these complications.



Patient Enrollment and Matching

We performed a single-institution, prospective cohort study approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Institutional Review Board/Committee on Clinical Investigations in Boston, MA. Forty-two consecutive patients were scheduled for urgent or elective primary CABG, valve replacement (mitral or aortic), or a combination of both requiring CPB. All study participants were provided informed written consent for surgical procedures and blood collection for this investigation. Patients with pre-operative documented AF, high-grade carotid stenosis, known calcified aortas, recent cerebrovascular accident, severe neurologic deficits, serum creatinine>2.0 mg/dL, and hepatic cirrhosis were excluded. Subjects undergoing aortic root/arch procedures, on antiarrhythmic medications, or unable to complete neurocognitive assessments were also excluded.

POAF was defined as sustained AF confirmed by electrocardiogram before postoperative day five that required anticoagulation or cardioversion. Of the 42 subjects enrolled, only the subset that developed both POAF and NCD was prospectively matched with selected SR+NORM and POAF+NORM patients based on pre-operative baseline characteristics (i.e. sex, age, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, white blood cell count, β-blocker use), intraoperative characteristics (i.e. CPB and aortic cross-clamp time, cardiotomy suction and antifibrinolytic use, procedure type), and postoperative characteristics (i.e. β-blocker use and time to extubation). Subsequent serologic and molecular studies were performed in a blinded fashion.

Surgical Technique

We followed our institution's conventional operative approach regarding general anesthesia induction, midline sternotomy, systemic heparinization, CPB, and invasive monitoring as previously described[14].

Neurocognitive Assessment

Patients underwent neurocognitive assessments performed by trained, blinded psychometricians between 1 and 10 days pre-operatively, on postoperative day 4, and in the 3rd month of the postoperative period. Patients were also evaluated for depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale. Memory, attention, language, global cognition, and executive functioning were assessed using 8 validated tools:

The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test measured verbal learning, recall, and retention by assessing the maximum number of items learned, the number of items recalled after 20 minutes divided by the maximum number learned, and the number of items correctly named from a list. Working memory and attention span were measured using Digit Span. Attention shifting ability was assessed by recording the time needed to complete Trailmaking A and B. Confrontational naming was measured using the Boston Naming Test. Fluency was evaluated by requiring patients to generate words beginning with a specific letter (phonemic fluency) or in a category (semantic fluency). The Visual Search and Acuity Test and Stroop Color-Word Inference Test measured visuospatial abilities and executive function. Premorbid intelligence was measured using the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. In accordance with the “Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery,” NCD was defined as a 1-standard deviation deficit from baseline on 25% of tasks[15].

Blood Collection and Microarray Processing

Blood samples were drawn from patients via central venous catheter pre-operatively immediately after anesthesia induction (pre-CPB), 6 hours postoperatively in the intensive care unit (post-CPB), and on postoperative day four (4D). Whole blood was drawn into PAXgene tubes (QIAGEN Inc, Valencia, Ca) for extraction and mRNA stabilization per the manufacturer's instructions.

RNA extraction and purification from whole blood, cDNA synthesis, and generation of biotin-labeled cRNA were performed by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Proteomics Core according to prior protocols[16,17]. All cRNA samples were hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays (Affymetric INc, Santa Clara, Ca). Chips were scanned using the HP G2500A ChipScanner (Affymetrix) and dChip software (Wong et al.[18], Boston, MA) was used for quality control analysis and signal measurement. No outliers were identified and all samples underwent subsequent pathway analysis.

Gene Expression and Pathway Analysis

Raw microarray data underwent gene expression analysis using JMP Genomics 4.0 (SAS, Cary, NC) for normalization, quality control, and statistical analysis. The Robust Multichip Average method normalized and compared composite chip data. Gene expression in Pre-CPB, Post-CPB, and 4D blood samples for POAF+NCD patients were compared to corresponding samples from SR+NORM and POAF+NORM using one-way ANOVA. A post-hoc false discovery rate algorithm with alpha of 0.05 minimized false positive results. Significantly, regulated genes met two criteria: 1) -log (P-value) exceeding the threshold calculated by JMP Genomics for each comparison and 2) fold change in gene expression >1.5 or <-1.5 between groups. A 1.5-fold change cutoff was chosen here and in a prior study of this patient population to reduce background noise while not limiting results to the most labile genes[14,19]. Significantly regulated genes were uploaded into Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA) to generate top canonical pathways regulated by the selected genes.

Real-time PCR

Gene expression analysis of whole blood-derived mRNA with Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays was validated previously by real-time PCR[20].



Patient Characteristics

Patients with POAF+NCD (n=6) were prospectively matched with SR+NORM (n=10) and POAF+NORM (n=5). Table 1 lists well-matched baseline characteristics of these subjects and shows no significant differences in race, sex, age, and co-morbidities as calculated by one-way ANOVA. Patients underwent similar intraoperative courses with regard to anesthesia, CPB technique, temperature, and perioperative monitoring. There were no differences in other postoperative complications, such as focal neurologic deficits or cerebrovascular events in patients with POAF compared to SR during the study period. Of 11 total POAF patients, 6 developed NCD (54.5%), and of 12 SR patients, only 2 developed NCD (16.7%). After three months, all but one patient returned regained normal cognitive function[20].



Gene Expression and Confirmation

We previously published comprehensive gene expression databases of patients with POAF or SR before and after CPB as well as patients with and without NCD after CPB, including unsupervised hierarchical sample clustering, and confirmation of microarray gene-expression data with real-time PCR[11,20]. Our described microarray GeneChip identified 54,675 transcripts. Complete lists of genes regulated in the comparisons of POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM or POAF+NORM are provided in Tables 2 to 7.



Gene Expression and Pathway Analysis in POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM

Figure 1 shows the distribution of regulated genes by fold-change for each time point in this comparison. Pre-CPB, 19 genes were significantly regulated in the POAF+NCD group compared to NORM+SR, of which 17 were named. Notably, 16 of these 17 genes were up-regulated, while 1 was down-regulated. Pathway analysis used to group genes by potential pathophysiologic functions demonstrated that these genes are related to cardiovascular disease, nervous system function, and cell death, as described in Table 8. Post-CPB, the number of genes increased to 65, of which 60 were named. All 60 were up-regulated, and while distinct from those regulated pre-operatively, pathway analysis demonstrated that many of these genes are associated with cardiovascular disease and remodeling, inflammation, and nervous system disorders, as seen in Table 9. At 4D, the number of genes decreased to 41, of which 34 were named. Of these, 30 were up-regulated while 4 were down-regulated. Several genes, as listed in Table 10, are similarly involved with cardiovascular disease, nervous system function, inflammation, and protein degradation.









Gene Expression and Pathway Analysis in Patients with POAF+NCD vs. POAF+NORM.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of regulated genes by fold-change for each time point. Pre-CPB 42 genes were significantly regulated in the POAF+NCD group compared to POAF+NORM, of which 29 were named. Of these, 18 were up-regulated, while 11 were down-regulated. These genes were associated with cardiovascular disease, nervous system function, and inflammation. Post-CPB, the number of regulated genes was 39, of which 37 were named. Sixteen of these 37 were up-regulated, while 21 were down-regulated. Pathway analysis demonstrated that these genes serve roles in cardiovascular disease and inflammation. At 4D, the number of regulated genes increased to 72, of which 54 were named. Twenty-seven of these were up-regulated, while 27 were down-regulated. IPA analysis again revealed that several genes affect cardiovascular disease, inflammation, and cell death. Selected genes grouped by pathophysiologic function for the POAF+NCD vs. POAF+NORM comparisons are found in Tables 11-13. While the majority of the genes identified for these comparisons were distinct from that of POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM across all time points, multiple genes overlap and are listed in Table 14.








AF and NCD after cardiac surgery have each been extensively studied. Much of the literature for POAF has pointed to inflammation and oxidative stress as promoting factors. Indeed, prior work from our group demonstrated significantly elevated genomic markers of oxidative stress in the blood of patients who develop POAF after CPB[11]. We similarly used microarray to study NCD patients and found increased expression of blood inflammatory mediators from those undergoing CPB[14]. Given that the genomic regulation of systemic cytotoxic insults such as oxidation and inflammation appear to promote POAF and NCD when studied individually, we sought to determine if genomic responses differ in patients who develop both complications.

Our current microarray study shows that the expression profiles of patients who develop both POAF and NCD after CPB differ from those who develop neither complication nor POAF alone. The greatest amount of gene regulation occurred postoperatively, suggesting that CPB may induce a differential genomic response in susceptible patients. Furthermore, POAF+NCD vs. POAF+NORM had the most gene regulation at 4D, while POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM had the most gene regulation post-CPB with a largely different set of genes identified. This suggests that POAF and NCD after CPB may be linked pathophysiologically through mechanisms distinct from those inducing POAF alone, with more genomic changes occurring at an earlier stage.

Many genes regulated post-CPB in POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM are associated with pathologic cardiac remodeling. One such gene includes BMX, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase. Mitchell-Jordan et al.[21] demonstrated that BMX-knockout mice were resistant to massive cardiac hypertrophy following transverse aortic constriction relative to wild type, indicating a significant role for BMX in cardiac remodeling. If the impressive 7.32-fold up-regulation of BMX in the blood of our POAF+NCD patients also reflects their myocardial expression, excess cardiac remodeling after CPB may be a predisposing factor for POAF and NCD. Additional up-regulated genes identified in this group with reported roles in cardiac remodeling include EPAS1, HGF, and MAPK14[22-24]. While there is much evidence for oxidative stress in cardiac remodeling and AF[25], our study found genes implicated in remodeling but not oxidative stress, perhaps due to our limited sample size. However, while Ramlawi et al.[20] demonstrated genomic regulation of oxidative stress in POAF patients, they did not report genes directly related to cardiac remodeling. This difference may lie in the fact that our patients developed NCD in addition to POAF, introducing a potential association of cardiac remodeling with secondary neurologic effects.

Several genes identified in the POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM comparison are also directly implicated in neurologic dysfunction. KIDINS220 was up-regulated post-CPB and has been shown to accumulate with tau protein in the brains of Alzheimer Disease patients[26]. At 4D, there was also increased expression of PLXNB1, which controls the behavior of microtubule tips and dendrite morphology[27]. Given its critical role in regulating the cytoskeleton and dendrite growth, it is postulated to be involved in the pathogenesis of several neurological disorders.

Genes related to inflammation and cell death were also identified in POAF+NCD vs. SR+NORM. KIDINS200, discussed above, has a known role in T-cell receptor-mediated T-cell activation in addition to its neurologic functions[28]. At 4D, up-regulated pro-inflammatory genes include NCR1 and DOCK. NCR1 encodes a natural killer cell receptor that triggers cytotoxicity, while DOCK1 is involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements required for phagocytosis[29,30]. Genes involved with protein degradation were also identified at 4D, including NEDD4L and UBE2H. NEDD4L encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase and UBEH2 encodes ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2H, both of which target proteins for lysosomal degradation[31,32]. These genes have no established relationship to either POAF or NCD after CPB, but given that systemic inflammatory and catabolic processes are known contributors to both complications, the regulation of these proteins at the genomic level may be relevant[33-36].

Our study has limitations, the most significant of which is the size of our patient population. A larger study may allow for the identification of more genes that may characterize complete pathways, such as the oxidative stress response, as opposed to our identification of several isolated genes related to various pathways. While our patients were well matched, our sample size also precludes us from respecting Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium. However, we hope that our findings stimulate interest in larger studies of this nature.

Another limitation is our profiling gene expression in blood rather than heart or brain tissues, both of which were not feasible in this study and would not be a practical option for future patient management strategies. It is unknown if the genes involved with cardiovascular and neurologic function identified in blood reflect pathways in the heart and brain. However, several genes we identified may have systemic effects through inflammation and cell death that may secondarily damage both heart and brain tissue and predispose these individuals to POAF and NCD.



Our findings may expand what is known about the pathophysiology underlying POAF and NCD. While we cannot assert a true genetic association between POAF and NCD given our limited sample size, our results suggest that differential genomic responses existed in our study sample of patients who developed both complications after cardiac surgery. There may have been an influence of pathologic cardiac remodeling and involvement of genes with known roles in inflammation, cell death, and nervous system function that may have promoted POAF and NCD in our patient population. We hope that the database of regulated genes provided by this work sparks further study of differentially expressed pathways that may deepen our understanding of these important and costly complications and potentially offer means of risk stratification and improved patient management.


1. Gao L, Taha R, Gauvin D, Othmen LB, Wang Y, Blaise G. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(5):3664-70. [MedLine]

2. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, Ng CK, Lamm G, Eber B. Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Card Surg. 2005;20(5):425-31. [MedLine]

3. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA, Gardner TJ, et al.; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 2004;110(14):e340-437. [MedLine]

4. Murkin JM. Etiology and incidence of brain dysfunction after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13(suppl 1):12-7; discussion 36-7.

5. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver B, Grocott H, Jones RH, et al.; Neurological Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Research Endeavors Investigators. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(6):395-402. [MedLine]

6. Creswell LL, Schuessler RB, Rosenbloom M, Cox JL. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(3):539-49. [MedLine]

7. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, VanderVliet M, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996;94(3):390-7. [MedLine]

8. Ommen SR, Odell JA, Stanton MS. Atrial arrhythmias after cardiothoracic surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(20):1429-34. [MedLine]

9. Fontes ML, Mathew JP, Rinder HM, Zelterman D, Smith BR, Rinder CS; Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery/cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with monocyte activation. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(1):17-23. [MedLine]

10. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Schram G, Lavoie J, Nattel S. Effect of simvastatin and antioxidant vitamins on atrial fibrillation promotion by atrial-tachycardia remodeling in dogs. Circulation. 2004;110(16):2313-9. [MedLine]

11. Ramlawi B, Out H, Mieno S, Boodhwani M, Sodha NR, Clements RT, et al. Oxidative stress and atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1166-73.

12. Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, Friedman AS, Koch C, Mangano DT, et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA. 1996;276(4):300-6. [MedLine]

13. Stanley TO, Mackensen GB, Grocott HP, White WD, Blumenthal JA, Laskowitz DT, et al.; Neurological Outcome Research Group; CARE Investigators of the Duke Heart Center. The impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on neurocognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(2):290-5.

14. Sabe AA, Dalal RS, Chu LM, Elmadhun NY, Ramlawi B, Bianchi C, et al. Preoperative gene expression may be associated with neurocognitive decline after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(2):613-22.

15. Murkin JM, Newman SP, Stump DA, Blumenthal JA. Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59(5):1289-95. [MedLine]

16. Jones J, Otu H, Spentzos D, Kolia S, Inan M, Beecken WD, et al. Gene signatures of progression and metastasis in renal cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(16):5730-9. [MedLine]

17. Ruel M, Bianchi C, Khan TA, Xu S, Liddicoat JR, Voisine P, et al. Gene expression profile after cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1521-30. [MedLine]

18. Li C, Wong WH. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(1):31-6. [MedLine]

19. Dalman MR, Deeter A, Nimishakavi G, Duan ZH. Fold change and p-value cutoffs significantly alter microarray interpretations. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13 Suppl 2:S11. [MedLine]

20. Ramlawi B, Otu H, Rudolph JL, Mieno S, Kohane IS, Can H, et al. Genomic expression pathways associated with brain injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(4):996-1005. [MedLine]

21. Mitchell-Jordan SA, Holopainen T, Ren S, Wang S, Warburton S, Zhang MJ, et al. Loss of Bmx nonreceptor tyrosine kinase prevents pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2008;103(12):1359-62. [MedLine]

22. Scortegagna M, Ding K, Oktay Y, Gaur A, Thurmond F, Yan LJ, et al. Multiple organ pathology, metabolic abnormalities and impaired homeostasis of reactive oxygen species in Epas1-/- mice. Nat Genet. 2003;35(4):331-40. [MedLine]

23. Chen AL, Ou CW, He ZC, Liu QC, Dong Q, Chen MS. Effect of hepatocyte growth factor and angiotensin II on rat cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45(12):1150-6. [MedLine]

24. Ren J, Zhang S, Kovacs A, Wang Y, Muslin AJ. Role of p38alpha MAPK in cardiac apoptosis and remodeling after myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;38(4):617-23. [MedLine]

25. Korantzopoulos P, Kolettis T, Siogas K, Goudevenos J. Atrial fibrillation and electrical remodeling: the potential role of inflammation and oxidative stress. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9(9):RA225-9. [MedLine]

26. López-Menéndez C, Gamir-Morralla A, Jurado-Arjona J, Higuero AM, Campanero MR, Ferrer I, et al. Kidins220 accumulates with tau in human Alzheimer's disease and related models: modulation of its calpain-processing by GSK3ß/PP1 imbalance. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(3):466-82. [MedLine]

27. Laht P, Otsus M, Remm J, Veske A. B-plexins control microtubule dynamics and dendrite morphology of hippocampal neurons. Exp Cell Res. 2014;326(1):174-84. [MedLine]

28. Deswal S, Meyer A, Fiala GJ, Eisenhardt AE, Schmitt LC, Salek M, et al. Kidins220/ARMS associates with B-Raf and the TCR, promoting sustained Erk signaling in T cells. J Immunol. 2013;190(5):1927-35. [MedLine]

29. Pessino A, Sivori S, Bottino C, Malaspina A, Morelli L, Moretta L, et al. Molecular cloning of NKp46: a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily involved in triggering of natural cytotoxicity. J Exp Med. 1998;188(5):953-60. [MedLine]

30. Wu YC, Horvitz HR. C. elegans phagocytosis and cell-migration protein CED-5 is similar to human DOCK180. Nature. 1998;392(6675):501-4. [MedLine]

31. Zhou R, Snyder PM. Nedd4-2 phosphorylation induces serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK) ubiquitination and degradation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(6):4518-23. [MedLine]

32. Kaiser P, Seufert W, Höfferer L, Kofler B, Sachsenmaier C, Herzog H, et al. A human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme homologous to yeast UBC8. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(12):8797-802. [MedLine]

33. Ramlawi B, Rudolph JL, Mieno S, Feng J, Boodwhani M, Khabbaz K, et al. C-Reactive protein and inflammatory response associated to neurocognitive decline following cardiac surgery. Surgery. 2006;140(2):221-6. [MedLine]

34. Hogan AM, Shipolini A, Brown MM, Hurley R, Cormack F. Fixing hearts and protecting minds: a review of the multiple, interacting factors influencing cognitive function after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2013;128(2):162-71. [MedLine]

35. Fontes ML, Amar D, Kulak A, Koval K, Zhang H, Shi W, et al. Increased preoperative white blood cell count predicts postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(4):484-7. [MedLine]

36. Canbaz S, Erbas H, Huseyin S, Duran E. The role of inflammation in atrial fibrillation following open heart surgery. J Int Med Res. 2008;36(5):1070-6. [MedLine]

Financial Support: Funding for this research was provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL46716, Dr. Sellke; T35HL094308, Dr. Dalal) and NIH Training grant 5T32-HL094300-03 (Drs. Sabe and Elmadhun).

No conflicts of interest exist for any of the authors.

Authors' roles & responsibilities

RSD Analysis or interpretation of data; statistical analysis; final approval of the manuscript; study design

AAS Study design; final approval of the manuscript

NYE Study design; final approval of the manuscript

BR Study design; final approval of the manuscript

FWS Final approval of the manuscript; study design; implementation of projects/experiments

Article receive on Saturday, May 2, 2015

CCBY All scientific articles published at are licensed under a Creative Commons license


All rights reserved 2017 / © 2019 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY