Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

0

Views

EDITORIAL

Apology to the use of double mammary

Fernando Moraes

DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20110038

Never apologize, do the best
(American proverb)

Few surgical procedures have changed so dramatically the natural history of disease in the last 40 years, as coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to coronary artery disease. The relief of angina pectoris and increased life expectancy observed in the majority of the thousands of patients operated worldwide is an indisputable fact. It should be noted that these benefits were most notable in certain subgroups of patients, especially those with multivessel disease and left coronary artery trunk lesion.

One of the milestones in the evolution of coronary artery bypass surgery was the demonstration by the Cleveland Clinic group, the superiority in terms of patency of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) over the saphenous vein [1]. Later, this group observed that the use of the LITA favorably influence long-term survival of patients [2]. Confirmation of these findings by other groups made almost mandatory the use of the LITA to revascularize the left anterior descending artery, especially in high risk patients such as diabetics and those with low ejection fraction [3].

Thus, the research phase began in order to determine whether there would be additional benefits with the use of two internal thoracic arteries (ITAs). First, it was shown similar patency rates in the medium and long term, the ITAs [4]. Subsequently, numerous reports have shown increased survival and reduced need for late reintervention with the use of two ATI even in patients with poor ventricular function and serious comorbidities [5,6]. On the other hand, certain arguments are demystified such as the use of two ATI would promote more bleeding and a higher rate of sternal infection [7].

Recent studies found that diabetic patients may present high sternum infectious complication rates if they make use of the dissected ITA pedicle [8,9]. However, Santos Filho et al. [10] showed that in this group of patients, sternal perfusion is lower than in non-diabetics, justifying a higher rate of infectious complications. Alternatively, when the ITA is dissected in a skeletonized fashion, sternal perfusion, with the use of scintigraphy, does not suffer a significant reduction, which seems to be the reason to reduce rates of infectious complications of the sternum and mediastinal disorders in diabetic patients in which two ATI were used[8,9].

Despite all the facts listed above, the use of two ATI is only performed in about 5% of services, according to analysis of the database of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) [11]. Why? It is hard to find the answer. But whatever the reasons, it is time for all cardiovascular surgeons to consider, make self-criticism and change their practice, increasingly aiming to offer a highly efficient operation. This is vital, especially for the competition of interventional cardiology, which would hardly reach the level of excellence of surgery if it is held with the utmost quality, which includes the use of two ATI.

REFERENCES

1. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89(2):248-58. [MedLine]

2. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, et al. Influence of the internal-mamary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(1):1-6. [MedLine]

3. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts: effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(4):216-9. [MedLine]

4. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, D'Alessandro S, Teodori G, Vittola G, Contini M, et al. Revascularization of the lateral wall: long-term angiographic and clinical results of radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(2):225-31. [MedLine]

5. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(6):2005-12.

6. Stevens LM, Carrier M, Perrault LP, Hébert Y, Cartier R, Bouchard D, et al. Influence of diabetes and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts on long-term outcome of multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(2):281-8. [MedLine]

7. De Paulis R, de Notaris S, Scaffa R, Nardella S, Zeitani J, Del Giudice C, et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: the role of skeletonization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(3):536-43. [MedLine]

8. Milani R, Brofman PR, Guimarães M, Barboza L, Tchaick RM, Meister Filho H, et al. Dupla artéria torácica esqueletizada versus convencional na revascularização do miocárdio sem CEC em diabéticos. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2008;23(3):351-7. [MedLine] View article

9. Sá MPBO, Soares EF, Santos CA, Figueiredo OJ, Lima ROA, Escobar RR, et al. Artéria torácica interna esquerda esqueletizada é associada a menores taxas de mediastinite em diabéticos. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26(2):183-9. [MedLine] View article

10. Santos Filho EC, Moraes Neto FR, Silva RAM, Moraes CRR. Diabéticos devem a artéria torácica interna esqueletizada? Avaliação da perfusão esternal por cintilografia. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009;24(2):157-64. [MedLine]

11. Tabata M, Crab JD, Khelpev Z, Edwards FH, O'Brien SM, Cohn LH, et al. Prevalence and variability of internal mammary artery graft use in contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Circulation. 2009;120(11):935-40. [MedLine]

CCBY All scientific articles published at rbccv.org.br are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Indexes

All rights reserved 2017 / © 2021 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY