lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed




Preditores de transfusão de concentrado de hemácias em cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica

Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira SáI; Evelyn Figueira SoaresII; Cecília Andrade SantosII; Omar Jacobina FigueiredoII; Renato Oliveira Albuquerque LimaII; Fábio Gonçalves de Rueda RuedaII; Rodrigo Renda de EscobarII; Alexandre Magno Macário Nunes SoaresII; Ricardo de Carvalho LimaIII

DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20110044


OBJETIVOS: Encontrar preditores de hemotransfusão pode facilitar a abordagem mais eficiente para utilização de serviços de banco de sangue em CRM. O objetivo deste estudo é identificar as características dos pacientes pré- e intraoperatórios que predizem necessidade de hemotransfusão durante ou após a revascularização miocárdica.
MÉTODOS: 435 pacientes submetidos à CRM isolada pela primeira vez, foram revisados para suas variáveis pré e intra-operatórias e analisados os dados pós-operatórios. Foram 255 homens e 180 mulheres, com idade média 62,01 ± 10,13 anos. Análise de regressão logística foi utilizada para identificar os preditores perioperatórios de hemotransfusão.
RESULTADOS: A hemotransfusão foi executada em 263 pacientes (60,5%). O número médio de unidades de hemoderivados por paciente foi de 2,27 ± 3,07 (0-23) unidades. O número total de unidades de hemoderivados foi de 983. A análise univariada identificou idade> 65 anos, peso <70 kg, IMC <25 kg/m2, hemoglobina < 13 mg/dl, hematócrito < 40% e fração de ejeção <50%, uso de circulação extracorpórea (CEC), não usar a artéria torácica interna como bypass, e múltiplos bypasses como preditores significativos. Os preditores mais fortes por meio de análise multivariada foram hematócrito < 40% (OR 2,58; IC 1,62-4,15; P<0,001), o uso da CEC (OR 2,00; IC 1,27-3,17; P=0,003) e múltiplos bypasses (OR 2,31; IC 1,31-4,08; P=0,036).
CONCLUSÕES: A identificação desses fatores de risco leva a uma melhor identificação de pacientes com uma probabilidade maior de usar sangue, melhor alocação dos recursos do banco de sangue e o uso custo-efetivo dos hemoderivados.


OBJECTIVES: Finding predictors of blood transfusion may facilitate the most efficient approach for the use of blood bank services in coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative patient characteristics predicting the need for blood transfusion during or after CABG in our local cardiac surgical service.
METHODS: 435 patients undergoing isolated first-time CABG were reviewed for their preoperative and intraoperative variables and analyzed postoperative data. Patients were 255 males and 180 females, with mean age 62.01 ± 10.13 years. Regression logistic analysis was used for identifying the strongest perioperative predictors of blood transfusion.
RESULTS: Blood transfusion was used in 263 patients (60.5%). The mean number of transfused blood products units per patient was 2.27 ± 3.07 (0-23) units. The total number of transfused units of blood products was 983. Univariate analysis identified age >65 years, weight <70 Kg, body mass index <25 Kg/m2, hemoglobin <13mg/dL, hematocrit < 40% and ejection fraction <50%, use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), not using an internal thoracic artery as a bypass, and multiple bypasses as significant predictors. The strongest predictors using multivariate analysis were hematocrit < 40% (OR 2.58; CI 1.62-4.15; P<0.001), CPB use (OR 2.00; CI 1.27-3.17; P=0.003) and multiple bypasses (OR 2.31; CI 1.31-4.08; P=0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of these risk factors leads to better identification of patients with a grater probability of using blood, allocation blood bank resources and cost-effectiveness use of blood products.


Blood transfusion has been an important part of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) since its beginning [1]. Transfusion rates in cardiac surgery remain high despite major advances in perioperative blood conservation and institutions continue to vary significantly in their transfusion practices for CABG surgery [2-7].

Despite current reductions in transfusion requirements for patients undergoing CABG, many patients continue to require transfusion because of the increased number of acutely ill patients undergoing CABG [3], surgical complications for patients with repeat cardiac surgery procedures [4] and excessive bleeding among patients with coronary artery disease on anticoagulant therapy [2]. In addition, bypass systems and hypothermia further compromise hemostasis [1].

The overall goal for finding the predictors of blood transfusion in postoperative period is to facilitate the most efficient approach for the use of blood bank services in CABG procedures. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify preoperative (demographic and clinical) and intraoperative patient characteristics predicting the need for blood transfusion in coronary artery bypass grafting in our local cardiac surgical service.



Source Population

After approval by the ethics committee of institution [8,9], we reviewed the records of patients undergoing CABG surgery at the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of Pronto Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco (PROCAPE) from May 2007 to April 2010. We excluded patients whose records did not contain the necessary data concerning the variables to be studied, those who had a previous cardiac surgery and also those who underwent cardiac surgery concomitant CABG, leaving only isolated primary CABG surgery for the study.

Study Design

It was a retrospective cohort of exposed and nonexposed to certain factors (independent variables) with outcome (dependent variable).

The independent variables were: age (years), age > 65 anos (yes or no) gender (male or female), systemic arterial hypertension (yes or no), diabetes mellitus (yes or no), smoking (yes or no), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (yes or no), peripheral vascular disease (yes or no), weight (kilograms - Kg), weight < 70kg, body mass index (BMI - kilograms per square meter - Kg/m2), BMI < 25Kg/m2 (yes or no), obesity (BMI > 30Kg/m2, yes or no), hemoglobin (Hb) < 13mg/dL (yes or no), hematocrit (Hct) < 40% (yes or no), preoperative renal failure (defined as creatinine > 2.3mg/dL or dialysis, yes or no), unstable angina (yes or no), class of New York Heart Association (NYHA I, II, III, IV), ejection fraction (EF - percentage measured by echocardiography), ejection fraction less than 50% (yes or no), stratification risk by EuroSCORE (standard and logistic), number of distal anastomoses (categorical and numerical), use of internal thoracic artery (ITA), type of surgery (on-pump or off-pump), for the on-pump group we assessed cardiopulmary bypass time (CPB - minutes) and aortic cross clamp time (minutes).

The dependent variable was blood transfusion during or after surgical procedure. Blood transfusion was reported both categorically (yes or no) and quantitatively (number of units transfused), defined as the use of red cell transfusion during operation and/or until discharge from the intensive care unit; preoperative blood usage was not evaluated.

Statistical Methods

Data were analyzed using percentage and descriptive statistics measures: mean, median and standard deviation. The following testes were used: t-Student with equal or unequal variances (for parametric variables) and chi-square test or Fisher's exact (as appropriate, for non-parametric variables). In the study of bivariate association between categorical variables, the values of the Odds Ratio (OR) and a confidence interval (CI) for this parameter with a reliability of 95.0% were obtained.

Multivariate analysis was adjusted to a logistic regression model to explain the proportion of patients who received blood products that were significantly associated to the level of 20.0% (P <0.20). The model was constructed by a backward elimination procedure [10], remaining significant variables in the model of up to 10.0% (P<0.10). We selected only categorical variables to compose the regression model. By this procedure, we set the initial model involving all selected variables. At each step, one non-significant variable is removed and a new model is adjusted to a point that all other variables in the model have significant contribution to a particular level of significance chosen previously to explain the probability that a patient has used blood products. The process uses the same criterion to determine the significance (same P-value) and, each step, the variable with the smallest contribution to the model (or variable with the largest p-value) is removed and a new model is set with the remaining variables in the model. This procedure is repeated until no variable can be removed. Through this model, OR values are estimated, according to the independent variables placed on the model.

The level of significance in the decision of the statistical tests was 5.0%. The program used for data entry and retrieval of statistical calculations was SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 15.0.



Baseline Patients' Characteristics (Table 1)

During the studied period were identified 542 patients underwent CABG surgery. We excluded 42 patients whose records did not contain the necessary data concerning the variables to be studied, 52 patients who had a previous cardiac surgery and also 13 patients who underwent cardiac surgery concomitant CABG, leaving 435 patients who underwent isolated primary CABG surgery for the study. In 172 (39.5%) patients, no blood transfusion was needed, and in 263 (60.5%) patients, at least 1 blood product unit was transfused. Of these, 125 (47.5%) patients received 1 to 2 units of blood products, 69 (26.3%) patients received 3 to 4 units of blood products, 33 (12.6%) patients received 5 to 7 units of blood products, and 33 (12.6%) patients received 7 or more of blood products. The mean number of transfused blood products units per patient was 2.27 ± 3.07 (0-23) units. The total number of transfused units of blood products was 983.

Patients receiving blood products had higher EuroSCORE (both standard and logistic). Operative characteristics also were different between the two groups; patients receiving blood products underwent on-pump more often, less use of ITA, higher mean number of grafts, and higher number of multiple grafts.

Univariate Analysis (Table 2)



Univariate analysis revealed the following preoperative risk factors for receiving blood products: age > 65 years, weight < 70 Kg, BMI < 25 Kg/m2, Hb < 13mg/dL, Hct < 40%, and ejection fraction < 50%. Operative risk factors revealed were the use of CPB, not using an ITA as a bypass, and multiple grafts.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis (Table 3)

All preoperative risk factors identified with univariate analyses were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. Only Hct < 40% was identified as an independent preoperative risk factor for receiving blood units. When operative risk factors were also entered in the multivariate model, the following independent risk factors were identified: on-pump CABG and multiple grafts.



The use of allogeneic blood transfusion after coronary artery surgery is still high despite published transfusion guidelines and costly blood conservation strategies [11,12]. Readily available patient variables can predict patients at risk for transfusion [13]. Preoperative predictor variables may facilitate blood component management and improve the efficiency of ordering blood before operations for patients undergoing CABG surgeries in order to assist blood banks in improving responsiveness to clinical needs [1,14].

This study identifies the independent risk factors for the prediction of blood transfusion during or after CABG surgery in 435 patients. In this patient population, there was an overall transfusion rate of 39.6%. In the literature, percentages of 25% to 95% of patients receiving blood products after CABG surgery have been described. Stover et al. [6] suggested that this variability could not be explained by a difference in patient preoperative characteristics or the length of CPB or solely by the calculated perioperative blood loss. This difference appeared to be institution dependent; in some institutions, the use of blood products appeared excessive relative to the perioperative blood loss [6].

In disagreement with other studies, the present authors found no difference of blood transfusion rates between genders. Some studies point female sex as a predictive factor for blood transfusion [12-17]. The reason why female patients receive more blood transfusion has been extensively studied by Shevde et al. [17]. Their conclusion was that it remains unclear why female patients receive more blood transfusion but that it may interact with other factors determining the probability of transfusion like age, weight, and duration of surgery.

In a systematic review involving 21 studies [18], blood transfusions were more frequently administered to adults who were older in age. In our study, we compared this variable numerically and categorically. We did not observed difference in numerical comparison between the two groups, but when we categorized in two other groups (>65 years or < 65 years), blood transfusion was more often present in the >65 years group). Elmistekawy et al [19], in a prospective observational study including 105 patients undergoing isolated primary CABG, observed difference in both numerical and categorical comparison (using the same categorization we did). But as we, in multivariate analysis model, this variable was not an independent predictor for blood transfusion.

In the present study, weight < 70 Kg was a predictor (not independent) of blood transfusion. It was not observed any relationship with obesity (BMI > 30 Kg/m2) or BMI < 25 Kg/m2. Elmistekawy et al. [19] observed the same, justifying the choice for body weight (and not BMI) for analysis in most models owing to the fact that univariate analysis and multivariate analysis proved that weight was a stronger predictor for blood transfusion than BMI in their cohort. Scott et al. [15] studied impact of decreased body weight (< 83 Kg) were significant predictors of transfusion.

Depressed left ventricular function (EF <50%) was a risk factor (not independent) for blood transfusion during or after CABG in the present studied population. Arora et al. [12], studying 3046 consecutive isolated CABG patients over 3 years to identify independent predictors of allogeneic blood product transfusion, showed that ejection fraction 0.40 or less was a strong predictor, including this variable in a validation of a prediction model tested in 2117 consecutive CABG patients.

Al-Shammari et al. [20] reviewed the medical records of 159 consecutive primary CABG patients retrospectively to determine the perioperative factors associated with intraoperative blood transfusion. One of the significant factors associated with blood transfusion on their research was three or more coronary bypass grafts constructed. In our study, we observed that the mean of distal anastomoses was higher in the blood transfusion group. We also identified that the more the patient needs more anastomoses, the more is the risk of blood transfusion after surgery, showing that the number of distal anastomoses is an independent predictor of the need of blood transfusion after CABG.

Although we have seen that several variables showed some association with the need for blood transfusion during or after CABG in the univariate analysis, two of these proved to be the strongest and independent predictors of postoperative transfusion in our institution: on-pump surgery and Hct < 40%.

Cardiopulmonary bypass activates the complement and fibrinolytic cascade, contributing to postoperative bleeding [21]. In a previous study in our institution [22] involving 941 women, with the aim of comparing outcomes between on-pump and off-pump CABG, there were minor rates of hemorrhagic shock and also the reduction of need for blood transfusions in the off-pump CABG group in comparison with on-pump CABG group. Nuttall et al. [23] showed that off-pump CABG surgery reduces perioperative bleeding and is associated with an overall reduction in allogeneic transfusion requirement. The present results show that on-pump surgery has a detrimental effect in postoperative blood transfusion (OR 2.00; P=0.003 in multivariate analysis).

Although we have not found a statistically significant difference in time of exposure to CPB between the groups, this is something that probably has some influence on the need of blood products. Souza & Moitinho [24], in a study involving 101 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, showed that patients with CPB time over 120 minutes show a trend of greater need of hemotransfusion if compared to those with lower CBP time. They also verifyed that, regarding patients' age, there was no important association between hemotransfusion need and surgery in an elderly patient. However, the association of surgery in elderly patients and CBP time superior to 120 minutes resulted in a larger postoperative use of blood products.

Perhaps one way to minimize the impact of CPB in necessity of blood components transfusions is the application of techniques of hemoconcentration. Souza & Braile [25] developed a study to evaluate a technique of hemoconcentration during heart surgery with CPB with and without a hemoconcentrator and the necessity of blood components transfusion in patients. They verifyed that this technique of hemoconcentration used during on-pump heart surgery was efficacious in the removal of fluids and allowed a greater utilization of the blood remaining in the oxygenator and a lesser necessity of blood component transfusion. They also argued that, apart from reducing the demand from the blood banks and diminishing the costs, a reduction of blood transfusions could result in a reduction of postoperative complications and, in particular, of long-term mortality rates in patients submitted to on-pump heart surgery. Another techniques promise to become more used in the future to avoid blood loss and need of transfusion, [26-28], reducing the presence of a factor associated with increased morbidity and mortality in several studies [29-34].

Preoperative anemia is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality after cardiac operations, and specifically for coronary operations [35,36]. The consequence of low values of Hct before or during the operation is, of course, a higher risk of receiving allogeneic blood products during or after the operation. In fact, the preoperative Hct is the major determinant of transfusions in cardiac surgery [37,38]. In our study, Hct < 40% was the strongest independent predictor for blood transfusion (OR 2.58; P<0.001 in multivariate analysis).

We point to the following limitations of this study: it was an observational investigation in which unknown variables could have influenced final results; the retrospective design of this study is vulnerable to a lot of bias; some data were lacking (e.g. intra-operative and/or postoperative blood loss), making the results less accurate; the sample size is relatively small, which explains some variables found to be important predictors in larger studies (e.g. age, gender) were found not to be related to transfusion in this study; our institution does not have clinical protocols or clinical thresholds for transfusion during or after CABG, so there was no uniformity in the criteria for transfusion in all patients; this is a sample of the institution, so that patients were not operated by the same surgeon, but, by various existing teams in the hospital; we did not analyze the pre-operative use of anti-platelet drugs, which possibly should have some influence on the appearance of bleeding and therefore transfusions.


1. Covin R, O'Brien M, Grunwald G, Brimhall B, Sethi G, Walczak S, et al. Factors affecting transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and red blood cells during elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(4):415-23. [MedLine]

2. Surgenor DM, Wallace EL, Churchill WH, Hao SH, Chapman RH, Collins JJ Jr. Red cell transfusions in coronary artery bypass surgery (DRGs 106 and 107). Transfusion. 1992;32(5):458-64. [MedLine]

3. Goodnough LT, Johnston MF, Toy PT. The variability of transfusion practice in coronary artery bypass surgery. Transfusion Medicine Academic Award Group. JAMA. 1991;265(1):86-90. [MedLine]

4. Hasley PB, Lave JR, Hanusa BH, Arena VC, Ramsey G, Kapoor WN, et al. Variation in the use of red blood cell transfusions. A study of four common medical and surgical conditions. Med Care. 1995;33(11):1145-60. [MedLine]

5. Kytola L, Nuutinen L, Myllyla G. Transfusion policies in coronary artery bypass: a nationwide survey in Finland. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(2):178-83. [MedLine]

6. Stover EP, Siegel LC, Parks R, Levin J, Body SC, Maddi R, et al. Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: a 24-institution study. Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(2):327-33. [MedLine]

7. Shander A, Moskowitz D, Rijhwani TS. The safety and efficacy of "bloodless" cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9(1):53-63. [MedLine]

8. Sá MPBO, Lima RC. Research Ethics Committee. Mandatory necessity. Requirement needed. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010;25(3):III-IV. [MedLine]

9. Lima SG, Lima TAG, Macedo LA, Sá MPBO, Vidal ML, Gomes RAF, et al. Ethics in research with human beings: from knowledge to practice. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010;95(3):289-94. [MedLine]

10. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative methods. New York: Nostrand Reinhold; 2001.

11. Lo Cicero J 3rd, Massad M, Gandy K, Sanders JH Jr, Hartz RS, Frederiksen JW, et al. Aggressive blood conservation in coronary artery surgery: impact on patient care. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1990;31(5):559-63. [MedLine]

12. Arora RC, Légaré JF, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA, Hirsch GM. Identifying patients at risk of intraoperative and postoperative transfusion in isolated CABG: toward selective conservation strategies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(5):1547-54. [MedLine]

13. Magovern JA, Sakert T, Benckart DH, Burkholder JA, Liebler GA, Magovern GJ Sr, et al. A model for predicting transfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(1):27-32. [MedLine]

14. Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Golding LR, Taylor PC, et al. Determinants of blood utilization during myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;40(4):380-4. [MedLine]

15. Scott BH, Seifert FC, Glass PS, Grimson R. Blood use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: impact of cardiopulmonary bypass pump, hematocrit, gender, age, and body weight. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(4):958-63.

16. Karkouti K, Cohen MM, McCluskey SA, Sher GD. A multivariable model for predicting the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing first-time elective coronary bypass graft surgery. Transfusion. 2001;41(10):1193-203. [MedLine]

17. Shevde K, Pagala M, Kashikar A, Tyagaraj C, Shahbaz N, Iqbal M, et al. Gender is an essential determinant of blood transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft procedure. J Clin Anesth. 2000;12(2):109-16. [MedLine]

18. Shehata N, Naglie G, Alghamdi AA, Callum J, Mazer CD, Hebert P, et al. Risk factors for red cell transfusion in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. Vox Sang. 2007;93(1):1-11. [MedLine]

19. Elmistekawy EM, Errett L, Fawzy HF. Predictors of packed red cell transfusion after isolated primary coronary artery bypass grafting - The experience of a single cardiac center: A prospective observational study. J Cardiothor Surg. 2009;4:20.

20. Al-Shammari F, Al-Duaij A, Al-Fadhli J, Al-Sahwaf E, Tarazi R. Blood component transfusion in primary coronary artery bypass surgery in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2005;14(2):83-6. [MedLine]

21. Hijazi EM. Is it time to adopt beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting? A review of literature. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2010;25(3):393-402. [MedLine]

22. Sá MPBO, Lima LP, Rueda FG, Escobar RR, Cavalcanti PEF, Thé ECS, et al. Comparative study between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft in women. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc.2010;25(2):238-44. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

23. Nuttall GA, Erchul DT, Haight TJ, Ringhofer SN, Miller TL, Oliver WC Jr, et al. A comparison of bleeding and transfusion in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting via sternotomy with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(4):447-51. [MedLine]

24. Souza HJB, Moitinho RF. Strategies to reduce the use of blood components in cardiovascular surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2008;23(1):53-9. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

25. Souza DD, Braile DM. Assessment of a new technique of hemoconcentration and the necessities of blood derivates for transfusion in patients submitted to heart surgery using cardiopulmonay bypass. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2004;19(3):287-94. Visualizar artigo

26. Chalegre ST, Salerno PR, Salerno LMVO, Melo ARS, Pinheiro AC, Frazão CS, et al. Vacuum-assited venous drainage in cardiopulmonary bypass and need of blood transfusion: experience of service. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011; 26(1):122-7. [MedLine]

27. Torina AG, Petrucci O, Oliveira PPM, Severino ESBO, Vilarinho KAS, Lavagnoli CFR, et al. The effects of modified ultrafiltration on pulmonary function and transfusion requirements in patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010; 25(1):59-65. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

28 . Benfatti RA, Carli AF, Silva GVR, Dias AEMÁS, Goldiano JA, Pontes JCDV . Epsilon-aminocaproic acid influence in postoperative bleeding and hemotransfusion in mitral valve surgery . Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc . 2010 ; 25 ( 4 ) 510-5 . [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

29. Dorneles CC, Bodanese LC, Guaragna JCVC, Macagnan FE, Coelho JC, Borges AP, et al. The impact of blood transfusion on morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2011;26(2):222-9. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

30. Magedanz EH, Bodanese LC, Guaragna JCVC, Albuquerque LC, Martins V, Minossi SD, et al. Risk score elaboration for mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass grafting. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010;25(2):154-9. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

31. Sá MPBO, Soares EF, Santos CA, Figueiredo OJ, Lima ROA, Escobar RR, et al. Risk factors for mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2011;26(1):27-35. [MedLine]

32. Anderson AJPG, Barros Neto FXR, Costa MA, Dantas LD, Hueb AC, Prata MF. Predictors of mortality in patients over 70 years-old undergoing CABG or valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26(1):69-75. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

33. Sá MPBO, Soares EF, Santos CA, Figueiredo OJ, Lima ROA, Escobar RR, et al. Validation of MadeganzSCORE as a predictor of mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26(3):386-92. [MedLine]

34. Sá MPBO, Soares EF, Santos CA, Figueiredo OJ, Lima ROA, Escobar RR, et al. Skeletonized left internal thoracic artery is associated with lower rates of mediastinitis in diabetic patients. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26(2):183-9. [MedLine] Visualizar artigo

35. Bell ML, Grunwald GK, Baltz JH, McDonald GO, Bell MR, Grover FL, et al. Does preoperative hemoglobin independently predict short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(5):1415-23. [MedLine]

36. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS; Reducing Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery (RBC) Investigators. Risk associated with preoperative anemia in cardiac surgery: a multicenter cohort study. Circulation. 2008;117(4):478-84. [MedLine]

37. Alghamdi AA, Davis A, Brister S, Corey P, Logan A. Development and validation of Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) to stratify cardiac surgery patients according to their blood transfusion needs. Transfusion. 2006;46(7):1120-9 [MedLine]

38 . Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, Frigiola A, Scolletta S, Giomarelli P, Biagioli B . Predicting transfusions in cardiac surgery : the easier, the better: the Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge

Article receive on segunda-feira, 30 de maio de 2011

CCBY All scientific articles published at are licensed under a Creative Commons license


All rights reserved 2017 / © 2021 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY